DemocratBill · H.R. 1770· House(119-HR-1770)

Consumer Safety Technology Act

Rep. Soto
Age: 48 years
Florida
Introduced
3/3/2025
Last activity
7/15/2025 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Sponsored by
Darren Soto
Cosponsors
Democrat - 2Republican - 1
Commerce
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. In Senate committee

What this bill would do

The Consumer Safety Technology Act directs various federal agencies to explore and report on new technologies. It mandates the Consumer Product Safety Commission to establish a pilot program using artificial intelligence to support its safety mission. Additionally, the Secretary of Commerce is required to conduct a study on how blockchain technology can be used for consumer protection and to mitigate fraud. Finally, the Federal Trade Commission must submit a report regarding its actions and efforts to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive practices involving tokens.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+5

    The bill enhances consumer protection by using AI to track product hazards and studying blockchain to mitigate fraud.

  • Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+3

    The bill addresses technology-related fraud and safety through AI and blockchain, which intersects with cybersecurity concerns.

  • Does this put more rules on large technology companies?+2

    The bill focuses on oversight of digital assets like tokens and the use of AI in safety missions.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.

What Congress actually voted on

One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.

  • The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to passPassed 336–36

    The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not.

    07/14/2025 · Roll call 192 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass”