Bill · H.J.Res. 57· House(119-HJRES-57)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to "Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf-High Pressure High Temperature Updates".
- Introduced
- 2/12/2025
- Last activity
- 2/12/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Sponsored by
- Andrew Clyde
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to overturn a specific rule from the Department of the Interior. The rule in question involves updates regarding "Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf-High Pressure High Temperature Updates." If passed, this resolution would provide for congressional disapproval under title 5 of the United States Code. Consequently, the rule would have no force or effect.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would business owners be better off under this?+1
The resolution benefits energy industry stakeholders by preventing the implementation of the specified Department of the Interior rule.
Would farmers be better off under this?+1
The reduction in federal regulatory oversight may benefit those in extractive industries often linked to rural economic development.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+1
The resolution reduces regulatory burdens on energy operations in the outer continental shelf.
The opposite
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?-2
By overturning safety and operational updates for high pressure/high temperature oil and gas wells, the bill may indirectly hinder more regulated fossil fuel production.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Elimination of the Department of the Interior Rule: The resolution aims to ensure the rule relating to "Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf-High Pressure High Temperature Updates" has no force or effect. This would prevent the implementation of the specific updates described in the rule. (H. J. RES. 57)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are detailed: The provided text does not list any specific negative consequences or burdens that would result from this resolution. (H. J. RES. 57)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+1Good For Farmers+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Reduces Gas Prices+1Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+1
- 3/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/12/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Introduced in House
Doug LaMalfaRepublican · California
Laurel LeeRepublican · Florida
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois