Bill · H.J.Res. 154· House(119-HJRES-154)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to the Adverse Effect Wage Rate.
- Introduced
- 3/26/2026
- Last activity
- 3/26/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Zoe Lofgren
- Cosponsors
- - 19 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Department of Labor. The rule in question concerns the "Adverse Effect Wage Rate Methodology for the Temporary Employment of H-2A Nonimmigrants in Non-Range Occupations in the United States." If passed, this resolution would ensure that the rule has no force or effect.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 6
Does this raise the lowest wage an employer may pay?-3
By overturning the Adverse Effect Wage Rate methodology, the bill removes a rule intended to establish higher wage floors for H-2A workers.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-2
The removal of higher wage rate methodologies may lead to lower wage floors for agricultural workers.
Would immigrants be better off under this?-2
The bill negatively impacts H-2A nonimmigrant workers by overturning rules designed to protect their wage levels.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Disapproval of Department of Labor Rule: By providing for congressional disapproval, the resolution would prevent the implementation of the rule regarding the "Ad에는ffect Wage Rate Methodology for the Temporary Employment of H-2A Nonimmigrants in Non-Range Occupations in the United States" (90 Fed. Reg. 47914, Oct. 2, 2025).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Nullification of Department of Labor Rule: The resolution dictates that the submitted rule shall have no force or effect, which stops the specific methodology for the "Adverse Effect Wage Rate" related to H-2A nonimmigrants from being applied.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants-2Good For Low Income Households-2Good For Union Workers-2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Minimum Wage-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Pathway To Citizenship-1
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/26/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Sam LiccardoDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Donald NorcrossDemocrat · New Jersey
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California