Bill · H.J.Res. 151· House(119-HJRES-151)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
- Introduced
- 3/4/2026
- Last activity
- 3/4/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Sponsored by
- Celeste Maloy
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management. The rule concerns the ``Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan'' issued on January 13, 2025. It also references a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability Office dated January 15, 2026. If passed, the resolution would declare that the rule has no force or effect.
Yes
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+3
Nullifying land management rules can potentially open up more local economic opportunities in rural areas near the monument.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The resolution uses congressional authority to reduce the power of a federal agency's specific rule.
Would Native Americans be better off under this?-5
Changing management plans for national monuments often impacts traditional lands used by indigenous communities.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-3
Disapproving the management plan removes specific resource management and protection protocols for the monument.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the BLM Rule: The resolution provides for the disapproval of the ``Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan,'' which would mean the rule has no force or effect.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Nullification of the BLM Rule: Because the resolution dictates that the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management shall have no force or effect, the specific management plan and record of decision issued on January 13, 2025, would be invalidated.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-3Improves Public Land Management-3Reduces Carbon Emissions-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Native Americans-5
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mark AmodeiRepublican · Nevada
Nicholas BegichRepublican · Alaska
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota