Bill · H.Con.Res. 56· House(119-HCONRES-56)
Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the disparity in wages paid to Latina women in comparison to White, non-Hispanic men.
- Introduced
- 10/8/2025
- Last activity
- 10/8/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- Sponsored by
- Teresa Leger Fernandez
- Cosponsors
- - 33 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A concurrent resolution is how the House and the Senate settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
This concurrent resolution recognizes the wage disparity between Latina women and White, non-Hispanic men. It designates October 8, 2025, as "Latina Equal Pay Day" to observe this pay gap. The resolution highlights how various factors like race, gender, and geography affect earnings. It further notes the economic impacts of lost wages on families and the broader economy. Finally, the resolution aims to recognize the disparity and reaffirm support for closing the gender wage gap.
Yes· 3 of 11
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?+2
The resolution specifically highlights and seeks to recognize the economic reality and pay gaps faced by Latinas.
Would women be better off under this?+2
The resolution reaffirms support for ensuring equal pay and addressing the specific economic challenges women face.
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?+2
The resolution calls for addressing the specific wage disparities faced by Latina women compared to White, non-Hispanic men.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of Wage Disparity: The resolution recognizes the impact of wage disparities on women, families, and the economy (Resolution Section 1).
-
Support for Pay Equity: The resolution reaffirms support for ensuring equal pay and closing the gender wage gap (Resolution Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Hispanic Americans+2Good For Women+2Good For Low Income Households+1Good For People With Disabilities+1Good For Rural Residents+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality+2Improves Racial Equity+2Improves Childcare Affordability+1Improves Poverty Reduction+1
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Minimum Wage+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+1
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/8/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 30 Cosponsors added.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Pablo HernándezDemocrat · Puerto Rico
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Luz RivasDemocrat · California
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Norma TorresDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Juan VargasDemocrat · California