Bill · S.Res. 760· Senate(119-SRES-760)
A resolution recognizing the United States-Philippines alliance on the 80th anniversary of diplomatic relations, the 75th anniversary of the Mutual Defense Treaty between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines, and the 10th anniversary of the landmark arbitral award upholding Manila's sovereignty against escalating aggression and lawfare by the People's Republic of China in the South China Sea.
- Introduced
- 6/8/2026
- Last activity
- 6/8/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2667-2668)
- Sponsored by
- Pete Ricketts
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes the long-standing alliance and diplomatic relations between the United States and the Philippines. It marks important milestones, including the 80th anniversary of diplomatic ties, the 75th anniversary of the Mutual Defense Treaty, and the 10th anniversary of the 2016 arbitral award in the South China Sea. The text strongly condemns aggressive actions and territorial claims made by the People's Republic of China against the Philippines. It expresses support for ongoing joint military exercises, defense cooperation, and economic initiatives like the Luzon Economic Corridor. Ultimately, the Senate reaffirms its commitment to defending the Philippines against armed attacks under their mutual defense agreement.
Yes· 3 of 11
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+9
Strongly reaffirms and strengthens the decades-old security and diplomatic alliance between the U.S. and the Philippines.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+8
Celebrates diplomatic milestones and promotes joint multilateral partnerships in the Indo-Pacific.
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+5
Promotes bilateral cyber campaigns and real-time command-and-control data sharing.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Economic Growth and Infrastructure: The resolution supports the Luzon Economic Corridor and the Pax Silica initiative, which are designed to catalyze mutual economic growth, create jobs, and improve transport, logistics, energy, and digital infrastructure. This can directly benefit individuals by boosting local economies and creating new employment opportunities.
-
Enhanced Security and Defense Support: The text highlights commitments to deploy advanced military capabilities, conduct bilateral training, and improve interoperability through military exercises like Exercise Balikatan. These actions help protect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Philippines and ensure regional stability for people living in the area.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Increased Risk of Regional Conflict: By condemning the aggressive actions of the People's Republic of China and reaffirming that the Mutual Defense Treaty covers armed attacks on Philippine vessels and aircraft, the resolution heightens geopolitical tensions. This could potentially lead to escalations or armed conflict that threaten the safety and security of individuals living and working in the region.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+9Improves Diplomatic Engagement+8Improves Cybersecurity Defense+5Improves International Trade+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Asian Americans+5Good For Veterans+4Good For Business Owners+3Good For Retirees+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+4Increases Job Creation+4
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Roads And Bridges+4
- 6/8/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2667-2668)
- 1 Cosponsor added.
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware