RepublicanBill · S.Res. 75· Senate(119-SRES-75)

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that member countries of NATO must commit at least 2 percent of their national gross domestic product to national defense spending to hold leadership or benefit at the expense of those countries who meet their obligations.

Rep. Tillis
Age: 66 years
North Carolina
Introduced
2/12/2025
Last activity
2/12/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S931)
Sponsored by
Thomas Tillis
Cosponsors
Republican - 9Democrat - 0
International Affairs
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution expresses the sense of the Senate regarding NATO member country obligations. It calls for member countries to commit at least 2 percent of their national gross domestic product to national defense spending. The resolution suggests that countries failing to meet this requirement should not hold certain leadership positions within NATO. It also targets leadership roles such as the Secretary General and various high-level military positions. Furthermore, it proposes that countries not meeting the spending threshold should be barred from hosting significant NATO meetings or summits. This is intended to ensure that those who meet their obligations are not disadvantaged.

Yes

  • Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+3

    The resolution seeks to strengthen NATO by ensuring all members meet financial obligations for mutual defense.

  • Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+2

    The bill aims to increase military readiness through higher defense spending commitments.

  • Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+2

    Increased defense spending could support better military readiness and structure.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.