Bill · S.Res. 672· Senate(119-SRES-672)
A resolution expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should prioritize bilateral security partnerships over multilateral security partnerships and institutions.
- Introduced
- 4/15/2026
- Last activity
- 4/15/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1787-1788)
- Sponsored by
- Mike Lee
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should prioritize bilateral security partnerships over multilateral ones. It argues that multilateral institutions have often failed to deliver returns on investment to American taxpayers. The text claims that bilateral agreements provide more leverage and allow diplomacy to be tailored to specific partner countries. It further asserts that certain multilateral organizations no longer align with United States interests or values. Ultimately, the resolution calls for the United States to encourage smaller states to choose the U.S. as their primary partner. It also suggests withdrawing support from multilateral institutions that undermine national interests.
Yes
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+5
The resolution seeks to reduce the financial contributions the United States provides to multilateral institutions like the UN and WHO.
The opposite
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?-6
The resolution prioritizes bilateralism over multilateralism, which may weaken existing large-scale international alliances.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Stronger Outcomes and Leverage: The resolution states that bilateral agreements deliver stronger outcomes and give the United States more leverage to advance its interests. (Whereas clauses regarding bilateral agreements)
-
Tailored Diplomacy: Bilateral negotiations allow diplomacy to be specifically tailored to the culture, needs, and capabilities of each partner country. (Whereas clauses regarding bilateral agreements)
-
Flexibility: Bilateral agreements are described as being easier to secure and more feasible to amend as the security environment or United States interests change. (Whereas clauses regarding bilateral agreements)
-
Protection of Interests: By prioritizing bilateral deals, the resolution suggests the U.S. can avoid being coerced into relinquishing interests at the expense of other great powers or adversaries. (Whereas clauses regarding bilateral agreements)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Withdrawal of Support: The resolution calls for the United States to withdraw support for multilateral security agreements or institutions that undermine United States interests. (Resolved section 3)
-
Loss of Global Influence/Standing: The text notes that the United States has historically contributed significantly to various multilateral institutions, such as the United Nations and the World Health Organization. (Whereas clauses regarding UN and WHO funding)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances-6
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+5
- 4/15/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1787-1788)