Bill · S.Res. 652· Senate(119-SRES-652)
A resolution recognizing the importance of the United States-Japan Alliance and welcoming the visit of Prime Minister Takaichi Sanae to the United States.
- Introduced
- 3/19/2026
- Last activity
- 3/19/2026 — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
- Sponsored by
- Bill Hagerty
- Cosponsors
- - 5 - 4
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes the importance of the United States-Japan Alliance and welcomes the visit of Prime Minister Takaichi Sanae to the United States. It reaffirms the strong and enduring alliance between the two governments, focusing on peace, security, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region. The text highlights historical ties, defense cooperation, and the shared commitment to national and economic security. It also notes Japan's increased defense spending and the importance of trilateral and quadrilateral partnerships. Finally, the resolution emphasizes the defense of the Senkaku Islands and the importance of various economic and diplomatic ties.
Yes· 3 of 10
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+7
The resolution reaffirms and strengthens the U.S.-Japan alliance and emphasizes trilateral and quadrilateral partnerships.
Does this make trade with other countries easier?+4
The resolution highlights significant bilateral trade and the implementation of specific U.S.-Japan trade and digital trade agreements.
Would business owners be better off under this?+4
The resolution supports economic security and supply chain resilience which benefits major industrial sectors.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Economic Opportunities and Job Creation: The text states that the United States and Japan are working together to create new economic opportunities and new jobs in sectors such as energy, artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and manufacturing. (Whereas section regarding economic opportunities)
-
Supply Chain Security: The resolution mentions a framework signed to secure the supply of critical minerals and rare earths to diversify the supply chain. (Whereas section regarding the United States-Japan Framework for Securing the Supply of Critical Minerals and Rare Earths)
-
Regional Stability and Security: The alliance is described as a cornerstone of peace and security, with the United States reaffirming its commitment to the defense of Japan and the protection of the Senkaku Islands. (Resolution section 5 and 6)
-
Support for Human Rights and Rule of Law: The resolution calls for continued cooperation in promoting shared democratic values, the rule of law, and respect for internationally-recognized human rights. (Resolution section 13)
-
People-to-People Ties: The text highlights various exchange programs and cultural connections, such as the Japan Exchange and Teaching Program and the National Cherry Blossom Festival, which strengthen ties between the two nations. (Whereas sections regarding exchange programs and the Cherry Blossom Festival)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Defense Spending Requirements: The text notes that Japan has committed to and achieved a goal of spending 2 percent of its gross domestic product on defense. (Whereas section regarding Japan's defense spending goal)
-
Potential for Conflict or Tension: The resolution mentions opposition to unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion in the East China Sea and South China Sea, noting the importance of deterrence. (Resolution section 6)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+7Improves International Trade+4Improves Cybersecurity Defense+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+4Good For Students+3
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+2Improves Rural Development+1
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+1
- 3/19/2026
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Bill introduced.
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi