DemocratBill · S.Res. 486· Senate(119-SRES-486)

A resolution condemning the suggestion by President Donald J. Trump that criticism of him is "illegal," reaffirming the fundamental importance of free speech, and declaring that criticism of the President is not only lawful but essential to democracy in the United States.

Rep. Markey
Age: 80 years
Massachusetts
Introduced
11/6/2025
Last activity
11/6/2025 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsored by
Edward Markey
Cosponsors
Democrat - 1Republican - 0
Government Operations and Politics
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

S. Res. 486 is a resolution that condemns suggestions by President Donald J. Trump that criticizing him is illegal. It reaffirms the importance of free speech and states that criticizing the President is lawful and essential to American democracy. The resolution calls for the Trump administration to stop using government power to punish or intimidate dissenting views. It specifically urges officials to avoid using regulatory or enforcement authorities to suppress speech criticizing the President or his policies.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?+8

    The resolution strongly affirms and protects the First Amendment right to criticize the President.

  • Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life?+8

    The resolution explicitly reaffirms the fundamental importance of free speech and the right to criticize public officials.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5

    It encourages accountability and scrutiny of the executive branch.

The opposite

  • Does this give the federal government more power?-5

    The bill seeks to limit the use of federal executive power to punish dissenting views.