Bill · S.Res. 421· Senate(119-SRES-421)
A resolution urging the executive branch and leaders of the G7 and the European Union to seize sovereign assets of the Russian Federation under the jurisdiction of members of the G7 and disburse such assets to Ukraine in tranches of not less than $10,000,000,000 United States dollars per month until expended.
- Introduced
- 9/29/2025
- Last activity
- 9/29/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6839-6840)
- Sponsored by
- John Kennedy
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 2
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution urges the executive branch and leaders of the G7 and the European Union to seize Russian sovereign assets held under their jurisdiction. It proposes that these assets be distributed to Ukraine in monthly payments of at least $10,000,000,000 until the funds are used up. The resolution argues that the Russian Federation is financially responsible for the harm caused by its war of aggression. It aims to create a multilateral fund to repurpose these assets for Ukraine's recovery and defense. Finally, it calls for using the sale of United States weapons as leverage to encourage countries to seize these assets.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+6
The resolution calls for increased coordination and a unified multilateral approach among G7 and EU leaders.
Would children be better off under this?+5
The funds are intended to assist in the recovery of Ukraine, which has suffered significant harm to its children.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+5
By supporting the defense of Ukraine, the bill aligns with broader strategic security interests of the United States.
The opposite
Does this make trade with other countries easier?-3
The resolution uses the sale of United States weapons as leverage to influence the trade and diplomatic decisions of other countries.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Financial Support for Ukraine's Recovery: The seizure and distribution of assets in monthly tranches of at least $10,000,000,000 is intended to support the reconstruction of Ukraine and its defense against the Russian Federation. (Section 4, Clause C)
-
Accountability for Damages: The resolution determines that the Russian Federation bears full financial responsibility for the harm caused by its unlawful war, which includes the destruction of critical civilian infrastructure estimated to cost $524,000,000,000. (Section 1; Whereas Clause 2, Item 4)
-
Deterrence of Future Aggression: The seizure of these assets is viewed as a legitimate means to deter future acts of aggression by other states. (Section 3, Clause C)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Diplomatic, Legal, and Financial Risks: The text notes that implementing the seizure of assets requires robust coordination to mitigate potential legal, diplomatic, and financial risks. (Whereas Clause 13)
-
Impact on International Weapon Sales: The resolution calls for prioritizing or deprioritizing the sale of United States weapons to countries based on whether they seize and distribute Russian assets to a fund for Ukraine. (Section 5, Clauses A and B)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+5Good For Urban Residents+4Good For Low Income Households+3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+6Improves Veterans Benefits+5Improves International Trade-3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Roads And Bridges+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2
- 9/29/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S6839-6840)
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island