DemocratBill · S.Res. 324· Senate(119-SRES-324)

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the actions of the Trump Administration that drastically and indiscriminately reduce staff at Federal agencies, freeze vast swaths of critical Federal funding, and dismantle Federal agencies are destructive and harmful to communities across the United States and have raised costs for American families.

Rep. Rosen
Age: 69 years
Nevada
Introduced
7/16/2025
Last activity
7/16/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S4423)
Sponsored by
Jacky Rosen
Cosponsors
Democrat - 10Republican - 0
Government Operations and Politics
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution expresses the sense of the Senate regarding actions taken by the Trump Administration. The text states that reducing staff, freezing funding, and dismantling Federal agencies is harmful to communities and has raised costs for American families. It specifically highlights how these actions disrupt critical programs for health, education, and economic stability. The resolution claims these changes negatively affect seniors, veterans, small businesses, and students with disabilities. Finally, it calls for a shift in focus toward protecting families and supporting various essential sectors.

Yes· 3 of 29

  • Would children be better off under this?+5

    The resolution advocates for protecting programs that serve children and families.

  • Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+5

    The resolution supports workforce development and job training for at-risk youth.

  • Would people over 65 be better off under this?+5

    The resolution highlights the importance of protecting Social Security and Medicare for seniors.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.