Bill · S.Res. 217· Senate(119-SRES-217)
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr. does not have the confidence of the Senate or of the American people to faithfully carry out the duties of his office.
- Introduced
- 5/12/2025
- Last activity
- 5/12/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S2865-2867)
- Sponsored by
- Angela Alsobrooks
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the Senate's lack of confidence in Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr. The resolution alleges that the Secretary has violated his constitutional oath and failed to meet various statutory obligations. It cites a pattern of conduct including mass terminations of federal employees and the reduction of critical research funding. The text claims these actions have harmed public health programs and disrupted essential services for seniors and people with disabilities. Furthermore, the resolution alleges the Secretary has undermined scientific integrity regarding vaccines and public health guidance. Ultimately, it seeks to declare that the Secretary is no longer fit to faithfully carry out the duties of his office.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 16
Does this put more money into medical research?-10
The text cites the termination of $11 billion in funding and hundreds of research grants as a major failure.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?-9
The text alleges the Secretary's actions deny individuals with disabilities the services they are entitled to.
Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak?-9
The resolution claims the termination of funding for research and surveillance has left states at risk for future pandemics.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Public Health Funding: The resolution notes the Secretary abruptly terminated $11,000,000,000 of critical public health funding, which affects disease surveillance, substance abuse services, and emergency preparedness. Stopping such actions would protect these essential services.
-
Support for Research and Training: The text mentions obligations to support research and training for women and individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds. Maintaining these obligations ensures progress in addressing health disparities.
-
�Preservation of Essential Services for Vulnerable Groups: The resolution highlights the Secretary's duty to ensure older Americans and individuals with disabilities are afforded dignity and the ability to participate in their communities. Protecting these roles ensures these populations continue to receive necessary support.
-
Maintenance of Scientific Integrity: The text alleges that the Secretary's actions have caused delays in scientific advancements and treatments. Maintaining current research functions would help prevent the loss of human health and lives.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Harm to Research and Medical Advancements: The resolution states that the termination of research grants has caused "direct, immediate, significant, and irreparable harm," which may delay treatments and compromise human health.
-
Threats to Public Health Safety: The text describes a multi-state measles outbreak occurring during the Secretary's tenure, resulting in 727 hospitalizations and 3 deaths. It also notes the stopping of flu vaccination advertising and the proposal to stop water fluoridation, which is used to prevent dental decay.
-
Loss of Employment and Essential Services: The Secretary has initiated the termination of many federal employees, including 5,200 probationary workers and a planned additional 10,000. These reductions are said to endanger children and seniors by undermining services like child care, Head Start, and foster care.
-
Impact on Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities: The reorganization of the Administration for Community Living has allegedly terminated half of the staff working on federal aging and disability programs, which impacts more than 11,000,000 seniors and 70,000,000 Americans with disabilities.
-
Erosion of Transparency: The elimination of staff from Freedom of Information Act offices is cited as an action that erodes the American people's ability to access government transparency and accountability.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For People With Disabilities-9Good For Seniors-8Good For Children-7Good For Women-7Good For Low Income Households-6Good For Hispanic Americans-5
- Healthcare
- Increases Research Funding-10Improves Pandemic Preparedness-9Improves Healthcare Access-8Improves Mental Health Access-5Increases Medicaid Funding-5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity-7Improves Childcare Affordability-6Improves Poverty Reduction-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency-8
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-5
- 9/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S2865-2867)
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts