RepublicanBill · S.Res. 101· Senate(119-SRES-101)

A resolution affirming the threats to world stability from a nuclear weapons-capable Islamic Republic of Iran.

Rep. Graham
Age: 71 years
South Carolina
Introduced
2/27/2025
Last activity
2/27/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1431-1433)
Sponsored by
Lindsey Graham
Cosponsors
Republican - 1Democrat - 1
International Affairs
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution affirms that the Islamic Republic of Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons capability poses a credible threat to the United States. It further states that such pursuit is an existential threat to Israel and other Middle Eastern allies and partners. The Senate asserts that all options should be considered to address this nuclear threat. Additionally, the resolution demands that Iran immediately cease activities that threaten the national security of the United States and its allies. This includes stopping uranium enrichment and the development of nuclear warheads or delivery vehicles. Finally, the text clarifies that it does not authorize the use of military force or the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities.

Yes

  • Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+7

    The resolution reaffirms the commitment to protect Israel and other Middle Eastern allies against nuclear threats.

  • Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+5

    The resolution aims to mitigate threats from Iranian-backed proxies that have killed and injured United States servicemembers.

  • Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+5

    The resolution addresses security threats that have resulted in the death and injury of U.S. troops.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.