Bill · S.J.Res. 94· Senate(119-SJRES-94)
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States requiring Members of Congress to forfeit their compensation during Government shutdowns.
- Introduced
- 10/29/2025
- Last activity
- 10/29/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Lindsey Graham
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment that requires Members of Congress to give up their pay during government shutdowns. A shutdown is defined as any period with a lapse in appropriations because regular or continuing funding was not enacted for federal agencies or departments. Under the proposal, any compensation forfeited by members during these periods will be transferred to the general fund of the Treasury. The Treasury must then use these funds to reduce the federal debt. Finally, the resolution gives Congress the power to enforce this new article through appropriate legislation.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?+2
Forfeited congressional salaries during shutdowns are allocated toward reducing the federal debt.
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?+2
Encourages fiscal accountability by tying members' pay to successful federal appropriations.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+1
Slightly reduces government expenditures by withholding congressional pay during funding lapses.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Reduction of the Federal Debt: According to Section 2, the money that Members of Congress lose during a shutdown is transferred to the general fund of the Treasury specifically to be used to reduce the federal debt. This could be seen as a positive outcome for the public because forfeited official salaries directly contribute to lowering national financial obligations.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility+2Reduces National Debt+2Reduces Government Spending+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Electoral Process+1Improves Government Transparency+1
- 10/29/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in Senate