Bill · S.J.Res. 64· Senate(119-SJRES-64)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Air Plan Approval; West Virginia; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan for the Second Implementation Period".
- Introduced
- 7/22/2025
- Last activity
- 7/22/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Sheldon Whitehouse
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution disapproves of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rule regarding West Virginia's plan for regional haze during the second implementation period. It states that the rule submitted by the EPA, as detailed in the Federal Register, will have no force or effect. The resolution was introduced in the Senate on July 22, 2025.
Yes
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+3
Disapproving the EPA's approval of the state plan may return more control over implementation to the state of West Virginia.
Would business owners be better off under this?+2
Removing EPA restrictions may lower compliance costs for local energy and industrial businesses.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+1
May reduce regulatory burdens on rural industrial operations in West Virginia.
The opposite· 3 of 8
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-5
The resolution disapproves of a regional haze plan intended to improve air quality.
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?-3
Overturning an EPA air quality plan may lead to higher emissions by removing implementation requirements.
Would children be better off under this?-2
Reduced air quality protections can disproportionately affect children's health.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The text does not explicitly mention any positive impacts for people if this resolution is approved.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The text doesn't spell out negative impacts for folks. The resolution disapproves a rule related to air quality, so if the EPA's rule is meant to improve air quality and this resolution stops it, there could be negative health consequences. However, without more information, it is impossible to determine what, if any, actual effects this might have.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-5Reduces Carbon Emissions-3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Rural Residents+1Good For Children-2Good For Low Income Households-2Good For People With Disabilities-2Good For Retirees-2Good For Seniors-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+3Increases Federal Power-2
- 7/22/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Introduced in Senate