Bill · S.J.Res. 210· Senate(119-SJRES-210)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision".
- Introduced
- 8/6/2026
- Last activity
- 8/6/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Bernie Moreno
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to overturn a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. The rule in question involves "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision." By passing this resolution, Congress would express its disapproval of that rule. If approved, the rule would have no force or effect.
Yes
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+2
Disapproving environmental regulations may reduce compliance costs for commercial harbor craft operators.
Would business owners be better off under this?+2
It reduces regulatory burdens on commercial harbor craft business owners.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+2
Disapproving a federal rule can be seen as returning regulatory oversight or autonomy to state-level standards.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?-5
By nullifying the EPA rule, the resolution reduces the regulatory push to lower emissions from nonroad engines.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-5
The disapproval of the EPA rule represents a rollback of environmental standards for commercial harbor craft.
Would people in cities be better off under this?-2
Reduced air quality standards may negatively impact health in urbanized harbor areas.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- There are no specific positive impacts or benefits for individuals or groups of people listed within the provided text.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people listed within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-5Reduces Carbon Emissions-5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Urban Residents-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+2Increases Federal Power-2
- 9/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/6/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas