Bill · S.J.Res. 178· Senate(119-SJRES-178)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Procedures for Supervisory Designation Proceedings".
- Introduced
- 4/13/2026
- Last activity
- 4/13/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Elizabeth Warren
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The rule in question involves the withdrawal of a rule regarding "Procedures for Supervisory Designation Proceedings." If passed, this resolution would ensure that the Bureau's rule has no force or effect.
Yes
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+1
Maintaining consumer financial protection procedures helps preserve oversight intended to protect lower-income consumers.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+1
The resolution prevents the Bureau from withdrawing its procedures for supervisory designation, thereby maintaining existing consumer protection oversight mechanisms.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+1
By blocking the withdrawal of a regulatory rule, the resolution maintains the continuity of established administrative procedures.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Maintenance of existing procedures: By disapproving the withdrawal, the resolution prevents the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection from removing the rule related to "Procedures for Supervisory Designation Proceedings" (S.J. Res. 178).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are detailed in the text: The provided text does not list specific negative consequences or burdens resulting from the resolution or the rule it addresses (S.J. Res. 178).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- 4/13/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Introduced in Senate