Bill · S.J.Res. 170· Senate(119-SJRES-170)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Compliance Bulletin 2016-03: Detecting and Preventing Consumer Harm From Production Incentives".
- Introduced
- 4/13/2026
- Last activity
- 4/13/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Elizabeth Warren
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to provide congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The rule in question relates to the withdrawal of a previous rule regarding "Compliance Bulletin 2016-03: Detecting and Preventing Consumer Harm From Production Incentives." If passed, this resolution would ensure that the submitted rule has no force or effect.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+5
The resolution prevents the withdrawal of guidelines designed to detect and prevent consumer harm from production incentives.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
Maintaining consumer protection guidelines against production incentives helps prevent harm to low-income consumers.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+3
The resolution preserves protections meant to prevent consumer harm from financial production incentives.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Maintaining Previous Protections: By disapproving the withdrawal of the rule related to "Compliance Bulletin 2016-03: Detecting and Preventing Consumer Harm From Production Incentives," the resolution aims to prevent the removal of guidelines intended to detect and prevent consumer harm from production incentives.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are mentioned: The provided text does not list any specific negative consequences or burdens that would result from this resolution.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Middle Class Households+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2
- 4/13/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Introduced in Senate