Bill · S.J.Res. 17· Senate(119-SJRES-17)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture relating to "Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions".
- Introduced
- 2/6/2025
- Last activity
- 2/6/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
- Sponsored by
- Cynthia Lummis
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to overturn a specific rule submitted by the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture. The rule in question concerns "Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions." If passed, the resolution would provide for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code. This action would ensure that the rule has no force or effect.
Yes
Does this change how police departments operate?+5
The resolution prevents the implementation of a Forest Service rule regarding law enforcement and criminal prohibitions.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+3
The resolution uses congressional disapproval to limit the regulatory power of a federal agency.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+2
Reducing federal law enforcement restrictions may benefit residents living near or utilizing National Forest lands.
The opposite
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-2
Disapproving a law enforcement rule for the Forest Service may reduce the oversight or deterrents needed to protect public lands.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?-2
Removing criminal prohibition rules may impact the Forest Service's ability to manage and protect public lands.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the Forest Service Rule: By stating the rule shall have no force or effect, the resolution prevents the implementation of the Forest Service's "Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions" rule.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are identified: The provided text does not contain information regarding the potential negative consequences or burdens of this resolution.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Policing Reform+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-2Improves Public Land Management-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+2
- 2/6/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota