Bill · S.J.Res. 142· Senate(119-SJRES-142)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Credit Union Administration relating to "Withdrawal of Fee Reporting Requirements".
- Introduced
- 3/24/2026
- Last activity
- 3/24/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Elizabeth Warren
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule. The rule was submitted by the National Credit Union Administration regarding "Withdrawal of Fee Reporting Requirements." It was issued on March 3, 2025. The resolution also references a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability Office dated January 16, 2026. This resolution aims to ensure that the rule has no force or effect.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+5
The resolution prevents the withdrawal of fee reporting requirements, thereby maintaining transparency for consumers regarding credit union fees.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
By maintaining fee reporting requirements, the resolution ensures continued transparency of financial costs to the public.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
Maintaining fee reporting requirements helps protect low-income consumers from hidden costs in financial services.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Maintaining Fee Reporting Requirements: By disapproving the rule, Congress prevents the "Withdrawal of Fee Reporting Requirements" submitted by the National Credit Union Administration. This ensures the previous requirements remain in place rather than being withdrawn.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the text: The provided text does not contain information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens resulting from this resolution.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For Urban Residents+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- 3/24/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey