A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury relating to "Regulatory Capital Rule: Modifications to the Enhanced Supplementary Leverage Ratio Standards for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies and Their Subsidiary Depository Institutions; Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt Requirements for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies".

Would business owners be better off under this?+2

The reduction in capital requirements may benefit large financial institutions and their owners.

Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?+2

The easing of banking regulations often benefits those with significant financial interests in large banks.

Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?+2

The easing of banking regulations often benefits those with significant financial interests in large banks.

Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?-2

Reducing capital and debt requirements for large banks may weaken overall consumer protections against banking failures.

Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?-1

Reducing regulatory capital requirements for systemically important banks may increase systemic financial risk.

Does this give the federal government more power?-1

By disapproving a Treasury rule, the bill reduces the regulatory power of a federal agency.