Bill · S. 502· Senate(119-S-502)
Rural Hospital Closure Relief Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 2/10/2025
- Last activity
- 2/10/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S820-821)
- Sponsored by
- Richard Durbin
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 4
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Rural Hospital Closure Relief Act of 2025 aims to amend the Social Security Act regarding Medicare critical access hospital designations. It restores the authority for States to waive the 35-mile rule for specific hospital facilities. These hospitals must meet certain criteria, including location in rural areas and specific financial or service needs. The bill includes limits on the total number of these designations nationwide and per State. A sunset provision terminates this specific certification authority after nine years. Additionally, the bill mandates studies by the GAO and MEDPAC to evaluate the impact and payment systems for rural hospitals.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+8
The bill specifically aims to prevent hospital closures and improve service capacity in rural communities.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+7
The bill restores state authority to waive the 35-mile rule to help rural hospitals maintain or expand essential services.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+5
The bill helps preserve healthcare access for Medicare beneficiaries in rural areas.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Healthcare Access: The bill allows certain hospitals to be certified as critical access hospitals even if they don't meet the 35-mile rule, provided the State certifies them as necessary providers for residents in the area (Section 2(a)(1)(A)(i)(III)).
-
Expansion of Essential Services: Hospitals seeking this designation must commit to opening or expanding a service line that is in high demand or limited supply, such as obstetrics or behavioral health care services (Section 2(a)(1)(A)(i)(v)(II)).
-
Financial Stability for Specific Facilities: The provision targets hospitals that have experienced two consecutive years of negative operating margins, potentially providing a path toward financial solvency (Section 2(a)(1)(A)(i)(iv)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Limited Availability of Designations: There is a cap on the number of these certifications available, limiting the Secretary to no more than 120 facilities total and no more than 5 facilities within any one State (Section 2(a)(1)(G)(i)).
-
Risk of Certification Revocation: Hospitals may lose their certification if they fail to submit required annual reports or notice of material changes to their service lines (Section 2(a)(1)(H)(ii)).
-
Temporary Nature of Designation: The authority to certify hospitals under this specific provision expires after nine years, which may create future uncertainty for facilities relying on this designation (Section 2(a)(1)(G)(iii)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+8Good For Seniors+5Good For Low Income Households+4
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+7Increases Medicare Funding+2
- 10/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/10/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S820-821)
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi