Bill · S. 4805· Senate(119-S-4805)
Save Our Shrimpers Act
- Introduced
- 6/17/2026
- Last activity
- 6/17/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- Sponsored by
- Cindy Hyde-Smith
- Cosponsors
- - 5 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Save Our Shrimpers Act" requires the Secretary of the Treasury to instruct U.S. Executive Directors at international financial institutions to oppose financial assistance for shrimp farming, processing, or exporting in borrowing countries. The Secretary of the Treasury can waive this requirement if they notify Congress that it is in the national interest of the United States. This requirement expires seven years after the Act is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 8
Would farmers be better off under this?+6
Provides a significant competitive advantage to domestic shrimp farmers.
Would business owners be better off under this?+4
Beneficial for US-based shrimp farming and processing business owners.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+3
Directly supports rural economies dependent on shrimp farming.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this send more money or help to other countries?-5
Restricts the use of international financial assistance for shrimp projects in borrowing countries.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?-2
May cause friction with borrowing nations whose shrimp industries are affected.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?-2
Opposition to foreign development projects can hinder diplomatic relations with borrowing countries.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Support for domestic shrimpers: By opposing international financial assistance for shrimp projects in borrowing countries (Section 2(a)), the bill may reduce foreign competition in shrimp production and exports.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Loss of international funding: Borrowing countries may lose financial assistance for shrimp farming, processing, or export projects (Section 2(a)), which could affect the economies of those regions.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Farmers+6Good For Business Owners+4Good For Rural Residents+3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Foreign Aid-5Improves Diplomatic Engagement-2Improves International Alliances-2Improves International Trade-1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+3Increases Job Creation+2Improves Economic Growth+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+1
- 6/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/17/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi