Bill · S. 4703· Senate(119-S-4703)
Redirecting Trump Slush Funds to Lower Health Care Costs Act
- Introduced
- 6/8/2026
- Last activity
- 6/8/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Jacky Rosen
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is titled the Redirecting Trump Slush Funds to Lower Health Care Costs Act. It stops Federal funds, including the Judgment Fund, from being used for legal financial settlements that benefit the President personally or politically. The bill also bans Federal funds from setting up or running commissions or funds, like the Anti-Weaponization Fund, used to provide those settlements. Instead, the bill takes unappropriated Treasury money and gives $1,776,000,000 to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. This money goes toward the Medicaid program to help address health care costs. It specifically provides funding to eliminate the funding and eligibility cuts from Public Law 119-21, which is known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Yes· 3 of 19
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+8
Directly restores Medicaid eligibility and funding cuts, substantially benefiting low-income individuals.
Does this put more money into Medicaid, the health coverage for people on low incomes?+8
Appropriates $1.776 billion to Medicaid and reverses previous eligibility and funding cuts.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+7
Restoring Medicaid cuts directly protects individuals with disabilities who depend on the program.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(b) appropriates $1,776,000,000 to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for the Medicaid program. This is a positive outcome because it addresses health care costs for individuals.
-
Section 2(b) provides funding to eliminate the funding and eligibility cuts enacted in Public Law 119-21, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This benefits people by reversing previous cuts to Medicaid.
-
Section 2(a) stops Federal funds and the Judgment Fund from being used for legal financial settlements that benefit the President personally or politically. This ensures taxpayer money is not used for those specific types of settlements.
-
Section 2(a)(2) stops Federal funds from being used to establish or maintain any commission or fund, such as the Anti-Weaponization Fund announced on May 18, 2026, that compensates the President. This protects public funds from being spent on those specific mechanisms.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+8Good For People With Disabilities+7Good For Children+5Good For Seniors+5Good For Middle Aged+4Good For Retirees+4Good For Women+4Good For Young Adults+4Good For African Americans+3Good For Hispanic Americans+3Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For Native Americans+3Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Urban Residents+3
- Healthcare
- Increases Medicaid Funding+8Improves Healthcare Access+7
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+4
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility+3
- 6/8/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.