Bill · S. 4572· Senate(119-S-4572)
Ending Passenger Rail Forced Arbitration Act
- Introduced
- 5/19/2026
- Last activity
- 5/19/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- Sponsored by
- Richard Blumenthal
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Ending Passenger Rail Forced Arbitration Act," seeks to amend title 49 of the United States Code. It specifically targets Amtrak to prevent the use of certain arbitration agreements. The legislation would prohibit Amtrak from using predispute arbitration agreements for consumer and civil rights disputes with its customers. Additionally, it aims to stop agreements that interfere with a customer's right to participate in joint, class, or collective actions. Under this act, such agreements and waivers would be considered invalid and unenforceable.
Yes· 3 of 10
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+7
The bill protects consumers by prohibiting mandatory arbitration and class-action waivers for civil rights and personal injury disputes with Amtrak.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+6
The bill ensures that disputes regarding disability discrimination can be addressed through the court system.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+6
The bill preserves a customer's right to seek judicial recourse for civil rights and personal injury claims instead of being forced into arbitration.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Rights: The bill aims to prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration for consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and its customers (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Preservation of Legal Actions: The legislation seeks to prohibit practices that prevent customers from participating in joint, class, or collective actions regarding consumer and civil rights disputes (Section 2(a)(2)).
-
Clarification of Dispute Resolution: By declaring certain agreements invalid, the bill ensures that the validity and enforceability of these agreements are determined by a court rather than an arbitrator (Section 2(c)(2)(B)).
-
Expanded Scope of Consumer Disputes: The bill defines consumer disputes broadly to include all claims related to personal injuries between Amtrak and its customers (Section 2(b)(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Exclusion of Certain Disputes: The prohibitions in this section do not apply to any dispute or agreement that is subject to the Railway Labor Act (Section 2(c)(2)(C)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For People With Disabilities+6Good For African Americans+5Good For Hispanic Americans+5Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Women+5Good For Seniors+4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+5Improves Racial Equity+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+7
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+6
- 5/19/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts