Bill · S. 4405· Senate(119-S-4405)
287(g) Expansion Act
- Introduced
- 4/28/2026
- Last activity
- 4/28/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Marsha Blackburn
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the ``287(g) Expansion Act'', aims to increase funding for specific jurisdictions. It allows States or political subdivisions that have entered into a written 287(g) agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to apply for more money. If approved, the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security can increase the annual Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant by up to 10 percent. This increase is based on the average amount the applicant received over the three most recent years. The bill authorizes up to $20,000,000 per fiscal year from 2027 through 2033 to fund these increases.
Yes
Does this tighten control of the border?+5
The bill provides funding specifically to enhance immigration enforcement through 287(g) agreements.
Does this give the federal government more power?+3
The bill expands the scope of federal-local cooperation in immigration enforcement via the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Would immigrants be better off under this?-7
The bill increases resources for local law enforcement to conduct immigration enforcement via 287(g) agreements.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?-6
The bill increases funding for immigration enforcement which primarily impacts Hispanic communities.
Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?-5
The bill focuses on increasing immigration enforcement rather than facilitating a path to citizenship.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Increased Funding for Jurisdictions: States or political subdivisions that enter into a 287(g) agreement can receive an increased allocation of Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants by up to 10 percent of their recent average (Section 2(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants-7Good For Hispanic Americans-6Good For Low Income Households-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+5Improves Pathway To Citizenship-5
- 7/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
- Darline Graham
Republican · South Carolina