RepublicanBill · S. 4024· Senate(119-S-4024)

Federal Taxpayer Funds Protection and Clawback Act

Rep. Scott
Age: 74 years
Florida
Introduced
3/5/2026
Last activity
3/5/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsored by
Rick Scott
Cosponsors
None
Government Operations and Politics
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill is known as the Federal Taxpayer Funds Protection and Clawback Act. It aims to strengthen oversight, accountability, and the recovery of federal funds given out through state block grants and other pass-through mechanisms. The bill amends the False Claims Act to clarify that claims include federal funds distributed through state, local, or other intermediaries. It also allows the Attorney General to hold state and local governments financially liable under certain actions. Furthermore, the legislation requires states to return 100 percent of disputed federal funds to the Treasury into an escrow account while a civil or qui tam action is pending. Finally, the bill sets strict rules for inspections, default remedies for noncompliance, and mandatory recoupment of funds alongside permanent ineligibility for entities that violate specific employment laws.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?+3

    Strengthens accountability and recovery mechanisms for federal funds distributed through state and local pass-through entities.

  • Does this give the federal government more power?+3

    Expands federal oversight and liability under the False Claims Act to include state and local governments holding federal pass-through funds.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3

    Enhances transparency and oversight rules for federal funds administered through state block grants and intermediaries.

The opposite

  • Does this leave more decisions to the states?-2

    Imposes heavy interim financial burdens on state governments by requiring 100 percent of disputed federal funds to be remitted to escrow.

  • Would business owners be better off under this?-1