RepublicanBill · S. 3921· Senate(119-S-3921)

Sanctuary Jurisdiction Event Security Enhancement Act

Rep. Scott
Age: 74 years
Florida
Introduced
2/25/2026
Last activity
2/25/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Sponsored by
Rick Scott
Cosponsors
Republican - 1Democrat - 0
Immigration
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The Sanctuary Jurisdiction Event Security Enhancement Act aims to change how Federal funds are used for Special Event Assessment Rating (SEAR) support. It establishes eligibility requirements that prevent "sanctuary jurisdictions" from receiving these funds for events held within their borders. The bill defines a sanctuary jurisdiction as a State or political subdivision that restricts the exchange of immigration status information or refuses to comply with certain Department of Homeland Security detention requests. If a jurisdiction is deemed a sanctuary jurisdiction and fails to certify immigration law compliance, its SEAR funding is withheld. These withheld funds are then reallocated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for enforcement efforts. The reallocation prioritizes public safety threats and mandates that at least 50 percent goes toward border-related removals and enforcement.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Does this give the federal government more power?+5

    The bill increases federal oversight by conditioning funding on compliance with federal immigration laws.

  • Does this tighten control of the border?+5

    The bill increases funding specifically for border-related removals and enforcement operations.

  • Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+3

    The bill reallocates funds that can support cyber support for event security.

The opposite· 3 of 5

  • Would immigrants be better off under this?-7

    The bill increases enforcement, detention, and removal efforts for noncitizens.

  • Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?-5

    The bill increases enforcement and removals, which may disproportionately impact this demographic.

  • Does this leave more decisions to the states?-5

    The bill reduces the autonomy of sanctuary jurisdictions by withholding funds for non-compliance.