Bill · S. 3911· Senate(119-S-3911)
A bill to designate the Pride flag as an authorized flag eligible for display at units of the National Park System, to express the sense of the Senate that the Pride flag should be on display at the Stonewall National Monument in the State of New York, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 2/25/2026
- Last activity
- 2/25/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- Sponsored by
- Charles Schumer
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill seeks to designate the Pride flag as an authorized flag eligible for display at units of the National Park System. It also expresses the sense of the Senate regarding the display of this flag at the Stonewall National Monument in New York. The legislation includes findings regarding the historical importance of the Stonewall National Monument and the June 1969 uprising. Additionally, the bill aims to condemn the removal of the Pride flag at the Stonewall National Monument. Finally, it expresses the desire for the flag to be restored at that location.
Yes
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?+7
The bill validates LGBTQ history and authorizes the display of the Pride flag in National Parks.
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?+6
The bill authorizes the Pride flag for display in National Parks and seeks its restoration at the Stonewall National Monument.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Flag Authorization: The bill designates the Pride flag as an authorized flag eligible for display at units of the National Park System (Section 1, a, 2, A and Section 1, b). This allows for the display of the flag at National Park System units.
-
Restoration of Display: The bill expresses the sense of the Senate that the Pride flag should be on display within the boundaries of the Stonestall National Monument (Section 1, a, 2, C and Section 1, c). This serves as a response to the removal of the flag at that site.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly identified within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For L G B T Q Community+7
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves L G B T Q Rights+6
- 2/25/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York