Bill · S. 3734· Senate(119-S-3734)
Close the Shadow Banking Loophole Act
- Introduced
- 1/29/2026
- Last activity
- 1/29/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- John Kennedy
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Close the Shadow Banking Loophole Act," aims to address deposit insurance applications submitted by industrial banks to the FDIC. It changes how industrial banks are defined and establishes new requirements for pending deposit insurance applications. For certain applications, the bill mandates a public comment period, a public hearing, and a two-thirds Board vote for approval. It also grants primary financial regulatory agencies more authority to examine and restrict the parent companies of industrial banks that received insurance after September 23, 2021. Additionally, the bill provides the FDIC with authority to require reports and examinations from parent companies of industrial loan companies.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill mandates a public comment period and a public hearing for certain pending deposit insurance applications.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+4
The bill enhances oversight of industrial bank parent companies to ensure financial safety and soundness.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-4
The bill imposes new reporting, examination, and potential restriction requirements on parent companies of industrial banks.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-3
The bill increases regulatory scrutiny and limits on changes in control for industrial banking entities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency for Pending Applications: For industrial banks with pending deposit insurance applications submitted on or before September 23, 2021, the bill requires a 90-day public comment period and a public hearing (Section 2(c)(1)). This allows the public to have a voice in the process.
-
Higher Standards for Application Approval: The bill requires a two-thirds vote of the FDIC Board of Directors to approve certain pending deposit insurance applications (Section 2(c)(1)(B)).
-
Enhanced Oversight of Parent Companies: Primary financial regulatory agencies are granted authority to conduct examinations and obtain reports from the parent companies of covered industrial loan companies (Section 2(d)(2)(A)). This helps assess the financial condition and risk management systems of these entities.
-
Promotion of Safety and Soundness: Regulators may impose conditions or restrictions on parent companies or their subsidiaries to promote the safety and soundness of the depository institution (Section 2(d)(2)(B)).
-
Expanded FDIC Authority: The FDIC is granted authority to require reports and examinations from parent companies of industrial loan companies, similar to the authority held regarding bank holding companies (Section 3(b)(1)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Strict Approval Deadlines: If the FDIC does not approve certain pending deposit insurance applications before September 30, 2026, those applications will be deemed denied (Section 2(c)(2)).
-
Restrictions on Corporate Control: The bill directs the appropriate Federal banking agency to disapprove changes in control of an industrial bank, subject to specific exceptions (Section 2(e)(1)).
-
Increased Regulatory Burdens on Parent Companies: The bill allows regulatory agencies to impose conditions, restrictions, or requirements for reports and examinations on parent companies and their subsidiaries (Section 2(d)(2)(B) and Section 3(b)(1)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners-4Good For High Net Worth Individuals-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+4
- 1/29/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey