Bill · S. 357· Senate(119-S-357)
Federal Freeze Act
- Introduced
- 2/3/2025
- Last activity
- 2/3/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Marsha Blackburn
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Federal Freeze Act" aims to restrict Federal agencies regarding hiring and pay. For a one-year period starting upon enactment, agency heads are prohibited from increasing the total number of employees beyond a set baseline number. Exceptions are allowed if the appointment serves law enforcement, public safety, national security, or emergency response. Additionally, the bill prohibits increasing the annual rate of basic pay for employees during that first year. Finally, the Act requires agencies to implement a reduction in force to decrease employee numbers by 2 percent after two years and by 5 percent after three years.
Yes
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+6
The bill mandates a reduction in force of 2 to 5 percent to decrease agency personnel costs.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Would union members be better off under this?-8
The bill mandates job cuts through a reduction in force and prohibits pay increases for federal employees.
Is this likely to create jobs?-7
The bill prohibits agencies from increasing their total number of employees for the first year.
Does this give the federal government more power?-3
The bill limits the administrative authority of agency heads to manage their own workforce and compensation.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Exceptions for essential services: Agency heads may still hire individuals if it serves the interest of law enforcement, public safety, or national security, or if the individual is essential for a declared emergency (Section 2(b)(1)(B)). This ensures that critical safety and security functions are not entirely halted by the hiring freeze.
-
Exemptions from workforce reductions: Employees determined by the agency head to serve law enforcement, public safety, national security, or emergency response are not counted toward the required percentage reductions in workforce (Section 2(c)(2)). This protects those performing vital functions from being part of the mandated staff cuts.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on pay increases: The bill prohibits increasing the annual rate of basic pay for employees for the one-year period beginning on the date of enactment (Section 2(b)(2)). This would prevent current employees from receiving raises during this time.
-
Mandatory workforce reductions: Agency heads must take measures to ensure the number of employees is 2 percent less than the baseline after two years and 5 percent less after three years (Section 2(c)(1)). This creates a mandatory reduction in force that could lead to job losses for agency employees.
-
Hiring limitations: Except for specific safety and security exceptions, agency heads are prohibited from increasing the number of employees beyond the baseline number for the first year (Section 2(b)(1)(A)). This restricts the ability of agencies to grow their workforce or fill new roles.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers-8Good For Low Income Households-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits-2
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+6Increases Job Creation-7
- 2/3/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.