Bill · S. 3460· Senate(119-S-3460)
PFAS Accountability Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 12/11/2025
- Last activity
- 12/11/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Kirsten Gillibrand
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The PFAS Accountability Act of 2025 seeks to amend the Toxic Substances Control Act. It aims to create a Federal cause of action for people significantly exposed to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The bill establishes a medical monitoring remedy to help address the harm caused by exposure. It intends to provide accountability for irresponsible PFAS manufacturing and use. Additionally, the act seeks to provide incentives for industry to fund research into the safety of these substances.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+7
The bill increases accountability for the irresponsible discharge and manufacturing of PFAS substances.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+6
The bill creates a federal cause of action for individuals exposed to harmful PFAS substances.
Does this put more money into scientific research?+5
The bill provides incentives for industry to fund research and allows courts to order additional scientific studies on PFAS safety.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
New Legal Recourse: The bill codifies a Federal cause of action, allowing individuals who are significantly exposed to PFAS to bring claims in district court (Section 3 and Section 4(b)).
-
Medical Monitoring: The act provides a remedy where courts may award medical monitoring to individuals or classes. This helps cover the costs of periodic diagnostic medical examinations that are necessary due to increased disease risks from exposure (Section 3 and Section 4(c)(1)).
-
Shifting Financial Burdens: The bill aims to shift the costs of medical monitoring from the affected individuals to the parties responsible for the exposure (Section 3).
-
Presumption of Exposure: The bill establishes a presumption that an individual was significantly exposed if they can demonstrate the defendant's involvement in the manufacturing process and a release of PFAS into an area of exposure for at least one year (Section 4(c)(2)(A)(i)).
-
Scientific Data Collection: Courts are given the authority to order new or additional epidemiological, toxicological, or other studies to provide reliable data regarding the health risks of PFAS (Section 4(c)(4)(B)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Burden of Proof for Disease Risk: While the bill allows for a lower standard of scientific proof if data is insufficient, the requirement still exists to show an increased risk of developing a disease associated with exposure (Section 4(c)(4)(A)).
-
Defendant Ability to Rebut: A defendant can challenge the presumption of significant exposure by providing independent testing results that suggest the PFAS levels were not sufficient to qualify as significant exposure (Section 4(c)(3)(A)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+7
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+4Good For People With Disabilities+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+6
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+5
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+2
- 12/11/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.