Bill · S. 3357· Senate(119-S-3357)
Social Security Survivor Benefits Equity Act
- Introduced
- 12/4/2025
- Last activity
- 12/4/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- Sponsored by
- Peter Welch
- Cosponsors
- - 5 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the ``Social Security Survivor Benefits Equity Act'', aims to amend title II of the Social Security Act. It proposes to update the specific amount of the Social Security lump sum death payment to $2,900. Additionally, the bill seeks to index these death payments to inflation. This indexing would be based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers. The changes are intended to apply to individuals who die on or after January 1, 2026.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this strengthen Social Security?+5
The bill increases the Social Security lump sum death payment to $2,900 and ensures future payments keep pace with inflation.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+3
The bill increases the death payment amount for insured individuals, which benefits surviving family members of seniors.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
The increased lump sum payment provides additional financial support to households following the death of an insured individual.
The opposite
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?-1
The bill increases federal spending obligations by updating the lump sum death payment amount and indexing it to inflation.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Updated Payment Amount: The bill replaces the current formula with a specific amount of $2,900, which updates the lump sum death payment (Section 2, subsection a).
-
Inflation Protection: For individuals who die in a calendar year after 2026, the $2,900 amount will be increased based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (Section 2, subsection a). This helps ensure the payment keeps up with inflation (Section 2, subsection a).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For Retirees+3Good For Seniors+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility-1
- 12/4/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts