Bill · S. 3330· Senate(119-S-3330)
Strengthening Sanctions on Fentanyl Traffickers Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 12/3/2025
- Last activity
- 12/3/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Ben Luján
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 2
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Strengthening Sanctions on Fentanyl Traffickers Act of 2025 aims to impose sanctions on those contributing to the international trafficking of illicit drugs. It specifically targets companies in the People's Republic of China that supply fentanyl precursors and various drug cartels that traffic fentanyl into the United States. The bill directs the President to prioritize identifying persons from the People's Republic of China involved in shipments of fentanyl and related equipment. It authorizes the President to block property and prohibit transactions for various foreign persons involved in the drug trade. Additionally, the bill maintains sanctions on specific transnational criminal organizations like the Sinaloa Cartel.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?+8
The bill targets the global supply chain and traffickers of fentanyl to combat the opioid epidemic.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
By targeting the fentanyl supply, the bill aims to mitigate the disproportionate impact of the opioid crisis on vulnerable communities.
Does this tighten control of the border?+3
The bill targets the international shipment and sale of fentanyl to reduce drug flow across borders.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Targeted pressure on drug suppliers: The bill allows the President to impose sanctions on the People's Republic of China entities that produce or sell precursors for illicit synthetic narcotics (Section 4, subsection a). This could disrupt the supply chain of fentanyl.
-
Crackdown on shipping and marketplaces: The President can sanction ports, ships, or online marketplaces that facilitate the shipment or sale of illicit synthetic narcotics (Section 4, subsection a). This could reduce the methods used to move drugs into the country.
-
Maintaining pressure on cartels: The bill ensures that sanctions against specific transnational criminal organizations, such as the Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation cartels, remain in effect (Section 5, subsection a).
-
Broad financial restrictions on traffickers: The President has the power to block property, prohibit banking transactions, and restrict loans for people involved in the global illicit drug trade (Section 6, subsection b). This could cripple the financial capabilities of traffickers.
-
Entry restrictions for bad actors: The bill provides for making certain sanctioned individuals inadmissible to the United States and allows for the immediate revocation of current visas (Section 6, subsection c).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Impact on specific entities in China: The President is authorized to impose sanctions on a wide range of entities in the People's Republic of China, including government entities and those providing material support (Section 4, subsection a).
-
Financial burdens on sanctioned organizations: The bill allows for the prohibition of United States government procurement of goods or services from sanctioned persons (Section 6, subsection b).
-
Travel restrictions for leaders and officials: The President may direct the denial of visas and bar certain individuals, such as leaders or senior executives of sanctioned persons, from entering the United States (Section 6, subsection b).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Improves Opioid Crisis Response+8
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Urban Residents+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+2Improves Fiscal Responsibility+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+3
- 5/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/3/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania