Bill · S. 3284· Senate(119-S-3284)
Streamline Transit Projects Act
- Introduced
- 12/1/2025
- Last activity
- 12/1/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Mike Lee
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Streamline Transit Projects Act. It amends title 49 of the United States Code to let certain funding recipients assume responsibilities related to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Eligible recipients are direct fund recipients located in urbanized areas with populations over 200,000 that demonstrate the capacity to perform these responsibilities. The Secretary may assign responsibilities for determining categorical exclusions and related environmental reviews to these recipients through memoranda of understanding. Eligible recipients that assume these responsibilities become solely liable for compliance and are deemed to be a Federal agency for those purposes. The Secretary retains the power to monitor compliance and terminate the assignment of responsibilities if the recipient fails to adequately carry them out.
Yes· 3 of 14
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?+5
By empowering eligible urban transit agencies to handle their own categorical exclusions, the bill significantly speeds up transit project development.
Would people in cities be better off under this?+4
Urban residents in areas with populations over 200,000 benefit directly from faster delivery and expansion of local transit projects.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+4
The legislation enhances local and state-level governance by allowing eligible transit recipients to assume federal NEPA responsibilities.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-3
The bill decentralizes federal authority by delegating environmental review responsibilities to local transit agencies.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-2
Allowing local transit agencies to assume NEPA categorical exclusion reviews could potentially reduce federal environmental oversight stringency.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Assistance and Support: Under section 2 adding new section 5322(d)(2), upon request by an eligible recipient, the Secretary must provide technical assistance, training, or other support relating to assuming responsibilities, developing memoranda of understanding, or addressing corrective actions. This ensures recipients get federal help when needed.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Sole Legal Liability: Under section 2 adding new section 5322(c)(2), an eligible recipient that assumes responsibility for a Federal law is solely responsible and solely liable for complying with and carrying out that law, with the Secretary having no responsibility or liability. This places the full burden of compliance and potential liability directly on the local transit agency.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Urban Residents+4Good For Business Owners+2Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Union Workers+2Good For Young Adults+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+3Improves Fiscal Responsibility+2Increases Job Creation+2Reduces Government Spending+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Public Transit+5Improves Roads And Bridges+3Reduces Carbon Emissions+2Improves Environmental Protections-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+4Improves Government Transparency+1Increases Federal Power-3
- 6/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/1/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Jon OssoffDemocrat · Georgia
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia