RepublicanBill · S. 3228· Senate(119-S-3228)

SIMSA Act of 2025

Rep. Grassley
Age: 93 years
Iowa
Introduced
11/20/2025
Last activity
11/20/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsored by
Chuck Grassley
Cosponsors
Republican - 2Democrat - 2
Crime and Law Enforcement
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill amends the Controlled Substances Act to establish a new category of regulated drugs called Schedule A.

Schedule A applies to imported or offered-for-import substances that have a chemical structure and central nervous system effect similar to existing scheduled drugs.

The Attorney General is given the power to temporarily or permanently add substances to Schedule A to help prevent abuse.

The legislation sets specific criminal penalties for importing, exporting, or falsely labeling Schedule A substances.

It also outlines registration requirements for people handling these substances for approved research, analytical, or industrial purposes.

Finally, the bill allows individuals serving prison terms for Schedule A offenses to petition for a sentence reduction if the substance is later descheduled or moved to a lower penalty schedule.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Does this tighten control of the border?+5

    The bill specifically targets imported or offered-for-import synthetic drug analogues, enhancing controls at international borders.

  • Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?+4

    The bill establishes regulatory controls and scheduling for synthetic drug analogues, which can aid in combating illicit synthetic drug abuse.

  • Does this give the federal government more power?+3

    The bill expands federal authority by granting the Attorney General broad powers to temporarily and permanently schedule new substances.

The opposite

  • Does this shorten or soften prison sentences?-4

    The legislation imposes severe criminal penalties, including up to 20 years or life imprisonment for certain violations involving Schedule A substances.

  • Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-3

    Temporary scheduling orders issued under the legislation are exempted from judicial review, raising due process concerns.