Bill · S. 26· Senate(119-S-26)
A bill to exclude locality adjustments from average pay for purposes of computing the amount of retirement annuities of new employees.
- Introduced
- 1/7/2025
- Last activity
- 1/7/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Bill Cassidy
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes to change how retirement annuities are calculated for certain employees. It seeks to amend Section 8401 of title 5, United States Code. Specifically, the bill aims to exclude locality-based comparability payments from the average pay used to compute retirement amounts. This exclusion would apply to a new category called a "revised average pay employee." These employees are those who were not covered under the chapter and had not performed creditable civilian service at the time the paragraph was enacted.
Yes
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+3
The bill reduces long-term government expenditures by excluding locality-based comparability payments from the calculation of retirement annuities for new employees.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?-3
The bill negatively impacts the future retirement benefits of young adults entering federal service as 'revised average pay employees' because their annuities will not include locality-based adjustments.
Would retired people be better off under this?-2
The bill reduces the ultimate value of retirement annuities for the new class of employees defined by this legislation.
Does this strengthen Social Security?-2
The bill reduces the retirement annuity amounts for a specific class of new employees by excluding locality adjustments from their average pay calculation.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Standardization of Pay Calculations: By excluding locality-based comparability payments from the average pay used for retirement, the bill establishes a specific rule for a new class of employees defined in Section 1, paragraph (4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Reduced Retirement Annuities: For "revised average pay employees," the exclusion of locality-based comparability payments from the calculation of average pay under Section 1, paragraph (1) could result in different retirement annuity amounts compared to those whose pay includes such adjustments.
-
Impact on New Employees: The new definition of a "revised average pay employee" in Section 1, paragraph (4) applies to individuals who become employed or become Members after the date of enactment, which could affect the long-term retirement benefits of those entering service.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Young Adults-3Good For Retirees-2Good For Low Income Households-1
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security-2
- 1/7/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Introduced in Senate