DemocratBill · S. 1904· Senate(119-S-1904)

Ending Taxpayer Support for Big Egg Producers Act

Rep. Reed
Age: 77 years
Rhode Island
Introduced
5/22/2025
Last activity
5/22/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S3119-3120)
Sponsored by
John Reed
Cosponsors
None
Agriculture and Food
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, titled the "Ending Taxpayer Support for Big Egg Producers Act," seeks to amend the Animal Health Protection Act. It targets "covered entities," which are defined as persons or companies with more than $100,000,000 in annual revenue and 1,500 employees. The bill establishes new requirements for these entities to receive indemnity or compensation from the Secretary of Agriculture for poultry flocks affected by highly pathogenic avian influenza. Specifically, these entities must certify they will not pay dividends or repurchase equity for a two-year period. For private equity-owned or public companies, additional certifications regarding economic necessity and liquidity are required.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?+5

    By limiting dividend payments and equity repurchases for large entities receiving aid, it ensures public funds support operations rather than shareholder returns.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3

    The bill increases transparency by requiring specific certifications regarding economic necessity for large producers.

  • Would farmers be better off under this?+2

    While it targets large entities, it enforces fiscal responsibility within the industry.

The opposite· 3 of 4

  • Would business owners be better off under this?-5

    Large-scale agribusiness owners face new financial restrictions and stringent certification requirements to receive aid.

  • Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-5

    The restrictions on dividends and equity repurchases negatively impact the liquidity and returns of large-scale corporate stakeholders.

  • Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?-5