Bill · S. 1796· Senate(119-S-1796)
HART Act
- Introduced
- 5/15/2025
- Last activity
- 5/15/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Amy Klobuchar
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The HART Act aims to modify premerger notification requirements under the Clayton Act. It focuses on the acquisition of residential property, which includes dwellings like single-family homes, condominiums, and multifamily housing. The bill stipulates that all acquisitions of residential property by a single person within one calendar year should be treated as a single acquisition. This change requires notifications to be filed when those combined acquisitions hit certain thresholds. Additionally, it provides specific exemptions and mandates that the Federal Trade Commission update federal regulations to match these changes.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this make housing cost less?+6
Increased transparency and oversight in residential property acquisitions may mitigate housing shortages.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
Mandating disclosure of aggregated property acquisitions increases transparency in the housing market.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+5
Enhanced oversight of residential property acquisitions may prevent market consolidation that harms consumers.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Would business owners be better off under this?-4
Real estate investors face new notification duties and potential regulatory hurdles.
Would high-income households be better off under this?-3
The new aggregation and notification requirements may increase the costs and administrative burdens of acquiring property.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-3
The bill imposes more stringent reporting requirements on multiple acquisitions within a single year.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Oversight of Residential Property Acquisitions: Under Section 3(a), all acquisitions of residential property by a person within a single calendar year are deemed a single acquisition. This allows the government to aggregate many smaller purchases into one single transaction for notification purposes, helping to track large-sclae residential property acquisitions.
-
Enhanced Information for Antitrust Determination: Section 3(d) directs the Federal Trade Commission to issue rules regarding the form and documentary material necessary for acquisitions. This is intended to help the Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General determine if these acquisitions might violate antitrust laws.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
New Requirements for Acquiring Persons: Section 3(a) requires that an acquiring person must file a notification once their aggregated residential property acquisitions within a single calendar year meet certain requirements. This places a specific notification duty on those acquiring residential property.
-
Exemption Limitations: Section 3(b) amends the Clayton Act to include exceptions for transactions involving residential property or investment rental property that are not solely for the personal use of an individual.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5Increases Federal Power+4
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For Urban Residents+3Good For Business Owners-4Good For Billionaires-3Good For High Income Households-3Good For High Net Worth Individuals-3Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+6
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/15/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts