RepublicanBill · H.Res. 959· House(119-HRES-959)

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that illicit fentanyl-related substances are a weapon of mass destruction and should be classified as such, and recognizing President Trump's efforts to mitigate illicit narcotics from entering the United States through such actions as signing an Executive Order "Designating Fentanyl as a Weapon of Mass Destruction" and declaring the crisis caused by the rise of fentanyl a national health emergency.

Rep. Dunn
Age: 73 years
Florida
Introduced
12/18/2025
Last activity
12/18/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
Neal Dunn
Cosponsors
Republican - 1Democrat - 0
Crime and Law Enforcement
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

H. Res. 959 expresses the opinion of the House of Representatives that illicit fentanyl-related substances should be classified as a weapon of mass destruction. The resolution recognizes President Trump's past actions in designating fentanyl as such and declaring the crisis a national health emergency. It identifies China, Mexico, and India as sources of these substances or precursors. The resolution concludes by stating the President should classify these substances as weapons of mass destruction and permanently place them in schedule I.

Yes· 3 of 23

  • Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?+8

    Aims to combat the leading driver of the opioid crisis by classifying fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction and placing it in schedule I.

  • Would children be better off under this?+5

    Reduces availability of lethal synthetic opioids in the community.

  • Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+5

    Reduces availability of lethal synthetic opioids in the community.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.