Bill · H.Res. 939· House(119-HRES-939)
Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States for high crimes and misdemeanors.
- Introduced
- 12/10/2025
- Last activity
- 12/11/2025 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Sponsored by
- Al Green
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 0
- Introduced
- Adopted by the House
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution seeks to impeach Donald John Trump, the President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. The resolution alleges that the President is an abuser of power who promotes violence and undermines democracy. Article I charges that the President called for the execution of six Democratic lawmakers in response to a video they posted. Article II alleges that the President has used abusive rhetoric and threats to intimidate federal judges. The resolution claims these actions violate his constitutional oath and the separation of powers. Ultimately, it calls for the President's impeachment, trial, and removal from office.
Yes
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+6
The resolution defends the constitutional separation of powers and the rule of law.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The impeachment process promotes accountability and transparency in executive conduct.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Lawmakers: The resolution seeks to address the President's calls for the execution of Democratic lawmakers, which is described as a promotion of extra-judicial punishment and assassination (Article I).
-
Preservation of Judicial Independence: By challenging the intimidation of federal judges, the resolution aims to protect the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers (Article II).
-
Safety of Public Officials: The document notes that the President's rhetoric has placed the lives of Federal judges, court officials, and innocent bystanders at risk; therefore, the impeachment process is presented as a way to address these threats (Article II).
-
Defense of Democracy: The resolution argues that the President's actions undermine democracy and the rule of law, implying that the impeachment process serves to protect the system of government (Article II).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Threats to Lawmakers: The text indicates that the President's actions involved threatening Democratic lawmakers in Congress with execution (Article I).
-
Threats to the Judiciary: The resolution states that the President has fostered a political climate where judges face threats of political violence and physical assault (Article II).
-
Risk to Court Officials and Bystanders: The President's actions are said to place the lives of Federal judges, court officials, and innocent bystanders at risk (Article II).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+6Improves Government Transparency+5
- 1/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 140, 47 Present (Roll no. 322).
- Mr. Scalise moved to table the measure.
- Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H5787-5789; text: CR H5787-5788)
- QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Green (TX) rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered the resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution. Upon examination of the resolution, the Chair determined that the resolution did constitute a question of the privileges of the House.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/10/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Green (TX) notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia