Bill · H.Res. 837· House(119-HRES-837)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the relationship between firearm violence and intimate partner violence and to honor the memory of Gladys Ricart and other victims of intimate partner homicide killed by firearms, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 10/28/2025
- Last activity
- 10/28/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Adriano Espaillat
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the serious connection between firearm violence and intimate partner violence in the United States. It honors the memory of Gladys Ricart and other victims of intimate partner homicides involving firearms. The text highlights startling statistics showing how domestic violence involving guns disproportionately impacts women, particularly Black, American Indian, Alaska Native, and Hispanic women. It commends advocates, service providers, and first responders who help survivors of domestic violence. Finally, it outlines steps for Congress and the House to take in order to address this deadly issue.
Yes· 3 of 10
Would women be better off under this?+7
The primary focus of the resolution is reducing the disproportionate rates of firearm homicides and domestic abuse experienced by women.
Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns?+7
The resolution calls for strengthening background checks and restricting firearm access for individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders.
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?+6
The resolution focuses heavily on protecting women from intimate partner violence and reducing gender-based disparities in firearm homicides.
The opposite
Would gun owners be better off under this?-4
Proposals to restrict firearm access for individuals under restraining orders and enhance background checks are viewed negatively by gun owners.
Does this protect the right to own guns?-4
The resolution advocates for stricter firearm restrictions and background checks, which opponents view as infringing on Second Amendment rights.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Survivors and Recognition: Under resolved section (1)(B), the House commends domestic violence victim advocates, service providers, crisis hotline staff, and first responders for their compassionate support of survivors. This is positive because it publicly acknowledges and validates the difficult, lifesaving work these professionals do for the people they serve every day.
-
Pledge for Research: Under resolved section (1)(C), the House pledges to fund comprehensive research on the connection between firearms and intimate partner violence, including its disproportionate impact on Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic people. This is a positive step toward understanding the problem better so officials we vote for can be held accountable to find real solutions.
-
Stances on Gun Restrictions and Safety: Under resolved section (2)(A) through (2)(E), the resolution states it is the sense of Congress that we should strengthen background checks, restrict firearm access for people subject to domestic violence restraining orders, support local relinquishment processes, and consider specific legislation like H.R. 4166 and H.R. 18. These provisions are intended to keep firearms out of the hands of prohibited individuals and protect people from domestic violence and firearm risks.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Specific Burdens Identified: Based strictly on the text provided, there are no specific sections or provisions within the bill that outline negative consequences, direct burdens, or penalties for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Women+7Good For African Americans+5Good For Children+5Good For Hispanic Americans+5Good For Native Americans+5Good For Young Adults+5Good For Gun Owners-4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gun Control Measures+7Improves Gender Equality+6Improves Racial Equity+5Improves Second Amendment Protections-4
- Healthcare
- Increases Research Funding+6
- 10/28/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.