DemocratBill · H.Res. 698· House(119-HRES-698)

Recognizing the victims, survivors, and thousands of other Americans impacted by the September 11, 2001, attacks, and for other purposes.

Rep. Thompson
Age: 78 years
Mississippi
Introduced
9/10/2025
Last activity
9/10/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
Bennie Thompson
Cosponsors
Democrat - 9Republican - 0
Crime and Law Enforcement
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution recognizes the victims, survivors, and Americans impacted by the September 11, 2001, attacks. It acknowledges the loss of life at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and on the hijacked planes. The text highlights the historical mission of the Department of Homeland Security to reduce national vulnerability to terrorism. It also notes that many people continue to suffer from physical and mental health impacts related to the attacks. Finally, the resolution expresses opposition to weakening the nation's counterterrorism and preparedness posture.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+1

    The resolution notes the importance of retaining expertise in cybersecurity to protect the nation.

  • Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+1

    The resolution recognizes the efforts of military personnel who assisted during the attacks.

  • Would people in cities be better off under this?+1

    The resolution highlights the need to protect terrorism-prevention funding for targeted cities like New York City and Washington, DC.

The opposite

  • Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-5

    The text expresses concern that funding cuts for terrorism prevention undermine national safety.