Bill · H.Res. 657· House(119-HRES-657)
Affirming the President's promise not to raise the Social Security and Medicare retirement age.
- Introduced
- 8/15/2025
- Last activity
- 8/15/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Marcy Kaptur
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution aims to affirm a promise made by President Donald J. Trump not to increase the retirement age for Social Security and Medicare. It asserts that these programs are commitments made to workers who have paid into the system. The text argues that raising the retirement age would reduce benefits for millions of Americans, especially those in physically demanding jobs or lower-income communities. It specifically notes that many seniors rely on Social Security for at least half of their income. Finally, the resolution calls on Congress to preserve current eligibility ages and reject any proposals to delay access to these benefits.
Yes· 3 of 11
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+8
The bill explicitly protects the retirement age and healthcare access for seniors.
Would retired people be better off under this?+8
The bill is designed to safeguard the retirement ages and benefits of current and future retirees.
Does this strengthen Social Security?+7
The bill seeks to protect Social Security benefits by preventing any increase in the retirement age.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Preservation of Retirement Income: By maintaining the current retirement age, the bill seeks to protect the income of the 39 percent of men and 44 percent of women aged 65 and older who receive 50 percent or more of their income from Social Security. (Whereas clauses)
-
Protection of Healthcare Access: Keeping the current Medicare eligibility age helps ensure that the millions of Americans turning 65 each year can access life-saving healthcare treatments and preventive services without facing higher out-of-pocket costs. (Whereas clauses)
-
Prevention of Benefit Reductions: The resolution aims to prevent what it describes as an effective benefit cut that would occur if the retirement age were increased. (Whereas clauses and Resolution clause 3)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly listed in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+8Good For Seniors+8Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Men+4Good For Women+4Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For Union Workers+3
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+5Increases Medicare Funding+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+7Improves Poverty Reduction+3
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/15/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Frank MrvanDemocrat · Indiana
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Juan VargasDemocrat · California