Bill · H.Res. 647· House(119-HRES-647)
Condemning remarks made by Representative Delia Ramirez of Illinois declaring her allegiance to the Republic of Guatemala before the United States of America.
- Introduced
- 8/12/2025
- Last activity
- 8/12/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
- Sponsored by
- Earl Carter
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution was submitted by Mr. Carter of Georgia to condemn remarks made by Representative Delia Ramirez of Illinois. The resolution states that Representative Ramirez declared, ``I'm a proud Guatemalan before I'm an American.'' It argues that members of Congress are elected to represent their U.S. constituents rather than foreign nations. The text notes that members take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Finally, the resolution seeks to condemn these comments and affirm that the interests of American citizens must come first.
Yes
Would white Americans be better off under this?+2
The resolution affirms a platform of prioritizing American interests over foreign ones.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+1
The resolution highlights the specific obligations and oaths that members of Congress must uphold regarding their constituents.
Does this tighten control of the border?+1
The resolution emphasizes the prioritization of American interests over those of foreign nations.
The opposite
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?-3
The resolution specifically targets and condemns the remarks of a Hispanic Representative regarding her heritage.
Would immigrants be better off under this?-3
The resolution's focus on prioritizing American interests over foreign ones may be perceived as negatively impacting immigrant political expression.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?-2
The resolution prioritizes American interests over those of other nations, which may impact diplomatic tone.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Affirmation of American Interests: The resolution affirms a commitment to always put the safety, prosperity, and overall well-being of the American people before other nations (Resolution, Section 4).
-
Emphasis on Representative Duty: The text reinforces the idea that members of Congress are elected to represent constituents residing in their specific district in the United States (Whereas clause 2).
-
Upholding the Oath of Office: The resolution highlights the requirement for members of Congress to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States (Whereas clause 4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Questioning of Representative's Priorities: The resolution states that the comments made by Representative Ramirez have cast doubt on whether she puts the interests of her constituents before those of the people of the Republic of Guatemala (Whereas clause 5).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For White Americans+2Good For Hispanic Americans-3Good For Immigrants-3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+1
- 8/12/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.