RepublicanBill · H.Res. 57· House(119-HRES-57)

Recognizing the benefits of natural gas to the United States economy and environment, and recognizing natural gas as an affordable and "green" energy.

Rep. Balderson
Age: 64 years
Ohio
Introduced
1/23/2025
Last activity
1/23/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
Troy Balderson
Cosponsors
Republican - 8Democrat - 0
Energy
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution recognizes United States-produced natural gas as an affordable and green energy source. It supports an all-of-the-above approach to meet United States energy needs and achieve energy dominance. The text highlights that switching to natural gas has lowered greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants. It also points out that a methane emissions fee from Public Law 117-169 results in higher costs for customers and acts as a regressive tax. Furthermore, the resolution notes that American liquefied natural gas exports helped lower European gas prices and reduce reliance on Russian energy. Finally, it supports Trump administration efforts to increase domestic natural gas production and expedite export facility approvals.

Yes· 3 of 16

  • Would business owners be better off under this?+6

    The resolution supports removing barriers to production and reducing taxes/fees for businesses.

  • Does this make trade with other countries easier?+6

    The resolution seeks to expedite the approval of new liquefied natural gas export facilities.

  • Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+5

    The resolution opposes methane fees that it characterizes as a regressive tax on low-income Americans.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.