Bill · H.Res. 502· House(119-HRES-502)
Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Secretaries of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services to transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to the development of a centralized database by the Federal government and Palantir Technologies Inc. that compiles American citizens' personal information across Federal agencies and departments, including confidential taxpayer, identity, wage, child support, bank account, student loan, health, medical, financial, or other information.
- Introduced
- 6/11/2025
- Last activity
- 6/11/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Lloyd Doggett
- Cosponsors
- - 18 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution is an inquiry requesting information from the President and several Cabinet Secretaries. It seeks documents regarding a centralized database being developed by the Federal government and Palantir Technologies Inc. This database reportedly compiles personal information of American citizens across various federal agencies and departments. The request covers a wide range of data, including financial, health, and identity information. Additionally, the resolution asks for details on the purpose of this database and specific services provided by Palantir under certain contract types.
Yes· 3 of 9
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8
The resolution specifically requests documents to increase oversight and transparency regarding a sensitive federal database.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+8
The inquiry seeks to protect privacy rights by investigating the centralized collection of personal citizen data.
Does this give people more control over their personal data?+7
The inquiry is aimed at providing transparency regarding how personal data is compiled and protected across agencies.
The opposite
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-5
The resolution investigates a database that could potentially facilitate increased domestic surveillance of citizens.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency: By requesting documents such as written agreements, contracts, and communications, the resolution aims to provide the House of Representatives with information regarding the development of a centralized database involving the Federal government and Palantir Technologies Inc. (Resolution Text, Section 1).
-
Oversight of Data Usage: The request for information regarding the purpose and potential uses of the database could clarify if the data will be used for things like Federal tax audits, criminal investigations, or restricting benefits (Resolution Text, Section 2).
-
Accountability for Government Contracts: The resolution seeks information on services provided under sole source contracts that lacked competitive bidding or under indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts, which allows for scrutiny of how the government awards business to Palantir Technologies Inc. (Resolution Text, Section 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Risk to Personal Privacy: The text describes a database that compiles various types of personal information, including confidential taxpayer, identity, wage, child support, bank account, student loan, health, and medical information (Resolution Text, Section 1).
-
Potential for Benefit Restrictions: There is a concern regarding whether the database will be used to restrict or deny Social Security benefits or restrict or deny Medicare coverage (Resolution Text, Section 2).
-
Potential for Information Sale: The resolution seeks to determine if the centralized database will be used to sell or make available information for private purchase (Resolution Text, Section 2).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+8Improves Privacy Rights+8
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+4Good For Seniors+4Good For Low Income Households+3
- Education And Technology
- Improves Data Privacy+7Increases Big Tech Regulation+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Domestic Surveillance-5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+3
- 6/11/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 18 Cosponsors added.
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jimmy GomezDemocrat · California
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard NealDemocrat · Massachusetts
Stacey PlaskettDemocrat · Virgin Islands
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California