Bill · H.Res. 353· House(119-HRES-353)
Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
- Introduced
- 4/28/2025
- Last activity
- 5/13/2025 — NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Thanedar notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.
- Sponsored by
- Shri Thanedar
- Cosponsors
- - 5 - 0
- Introduced
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 353 is a resolution introduced in the House of Representatives to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. The resolution lists seven articles of impeachment to be presented to the Senate. These articles include obstruction of justice, usurpation of appropriations power, abuse of trade powers and international aggression, violation of First Amendment rights, creation of unlawful office, bribery and corruption, and tyranny.
Potential Positive Impacts for People:
The document does not explicitly state any positive impacts for people. It is focused on the alleged wrongdoings of the President.
Potential Negative Impacts for People:
-
Article I: Obstruction of Justice, violation of due process, and a breach of the duty to faithfully execute laws: Allegedly, Donald John Trump directed his subordinates to dismiss bribery and fraud charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, thus abusing the criminal laws. He also allegedly defied court orders, including those related to the removal of persons from the United States and acted in contempt of court for violating a court-sanctioned settlement agreement, which could have negative impacts on individuals affected by these actions.
-
Article II: Usurpation of the appropriations power: The alleged dismantling of the Department of Education and the elimination of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) could negatively impact students, educational institutions, recipients of foreign aid, and individuals relying on disaster relief, conflict relief, and other USAID programs.
-
Article III: Abuse of trade powers and international aggression: The alleged imposition of unjustifiable tariffs on foreign nations could cause a sharp decline in the United States economy and the economies of countries around the world. The alleged threats of invasion, the annexation of territory, and the occupation of sovereign territory through the use of military action could implicate the United States in violations of international law and create hostilities towards Americans.
-
Article IV: Violation of first amendment rights: The alleged retaliation against law firms and attorneys who have advised or represented, or been associated with those who advise or represent, litigants who displease him, could have a chilling effect on the public discourse, and striking at the core freedoms essential to a free society and democratic elections under the Constitution.
-
Article V: Creation of unlawful office: The alleged creation of an unlawful office, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (``DOGE''), could negatively impact government employees through impoundment of funds appropriated by Congress; violations of privacy and security laws with respect to sensitive information systems, personally identifiable information, and classified material; and termination of government employees under false pretenses and in violation of civil service laws.
-
Article VI: Bribery and corruption: The alleged solicitation and acceptance of bribes in exchange for official actions could have a significant detrimental effect on the fairness and integrity of government operations, potentially harming the public interest.
-
Article VII: Tyranny: The alleged denial and violation of the right of the People of the United States to freedom of speech, and of assembly, and to petition the government for redress of grievances, as well as, the suggestion that he intends to violate the Presidential term limits established by the 22d Amendment to the Constitution, could have a significant detrimental effect on the public.
Yes· 3 of 22
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?+8
The bill targets alleged retaliation against critics and the suppression of dissent.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+8
The bill opposes the alleged enforced disappearances and violation of due process rights.
Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life?+8
The bill seeks to remove a President alleged to have violated First Amendment rights and suppressed dissent.
The opposite· 3 of 11
Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?-8
The bill alleges an attempt to abrogate the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment for certain persons born in the U.S.
Is this likely to grow the economy?-7
The bill alleges that unjustified tariffs caused a sharp decline in the U.S. and global economies.
Would billionaires be better off under this?-5
The bill targets an unlawful office (DOGE) headed by a high-net-worth individual (Elon Musk).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+7Good For Students+6Good For Veterans+6Good For Children+5Good For Farmers+5Good For Hispanic Americans+5Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Young Adults+5Good For Billionaires-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+8Improves Freedom Of Speech+8Improves Government Transparency+7Improves Privacy Rights+6Increase States Rights+5Increases Federal Power-5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+7Improves International Alliances+7Improves International Trade+6Increases Foreign Aid+5Improves Veterans Benefits-5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth-7Improves Fiscal Responsibility-5Increases Job Creation-5
- Education And Technology
- Improves Data Privacy+5Increases Public School Funding+5Increases Scientific Research Funding+5
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access-5Improves Veterans Healthcare-5Increases Research Funding-5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Freedom Of Speech+8Improves Pathway To Citizenship-8Improves Poverty Reduction-5
- 5/13/2025
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1953)
- NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Thanedar notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.
- 5/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois