Bill · H.Res. 302· House(119-HRES-302)
Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Secretaries of the Treasury and Labor to transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to the effect on local economies and communities of the Department of Government Efficiency and newly-imposed tariffs.
- Introduced
- 4/8/2025
- Last activity
- 4/8/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Donald Beyer
- Cosponsors
- - 15 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution is an inquiry requesting the President to provide specific documents to the House of Representatives. It directs the Secretaries of the Treasury and Labor to transmit records related to the impact of the Department of Government Efficiency and new tariffs. The request seeks information on local GDP reductions caused by federal layoffs and lease terminations. It also asks for data regarding unemployment trends and claims in affected communities. Finally, it requests information on the projected change in costs for goods subject to new tariffs.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The resolution seeks to increase transparency by requesting documents related to economic and employment impacts.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would union members be better off under this?-3
The resolution highlights potential mass layoffs and contract terminations that could harm workers.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-2
Potential increases in unemployment and cost of goods could negatively impact low-income households.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?-2
Tariffs and federal job losses could negatively affect middle-class economic stability.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Increased Transparency and Accountability: By requesting documents such as reports, studies, and correspondence, the resolution aims to provide the House of Representatives with information regarding the effects of the Department of Government Efficiency and new tariffs (Resolution, Section 1).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Reductions in Local Economies: The bill notes potential reductions in the local area gross domestic product of State, regional, or local economies resulting from mass layoffs of Federal workers and lease terminations recommended by the Department of Government Efficiency (Section 1).
-
Impact on Federal Employment and Services: The bill identifies potential negative outcomes including mass layoffs of employees from the Internal Revenue Service and staff at local and regional Social Security offices (Section 1).
-
Unemployment Risks: The resolution seeks information on negative trends such as increased unemployment rates, longer unemployment durations, and increased total unemployment claims following reductions in force, terminations of probationary employees, or termination of large Federal contracts (Section 2).
-
Increased Cost of Goods: The bill seeks to track the projected change in the cost of imported goods subject to tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico, or any other country (Section 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers-3Good For Low Income Households-2Good For Middle Class Households-2Good For Retirees-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- 4/8/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 15 Cosponsors added.
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jimmy GomezDemocrat · California
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard NealDemocrat · Massachusetts
Stacey PlaskettDemocrat · Virgin Islands
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York